May 8, 2009

startrek2009First of all, let me assure all old school Star Trek fans, that is, fans of the original series and the six movies that followed it, that the new J.J. Abrams directed Star Trek, which forms a prequel to the series and the movies, is almost unfailingly respectful to its original sources. Longtime fans will have a great time spotting references to the series and previous films, which are woven into both the narrative and the background. In fact, the movie leans so heavily on its original sources that I wonder what audiences completely new to the Star Trek universe will make of it. I imagine what they’ll see is an attractive young cast, headed by Chris Pine as James T. Kirk and Zachary Quinto as Spock, in a super fast paced sci-fi action adventure that pits the crew of the USS Enterprise against Nero (Eric Bana), a Romulan bent on a spectacular and particularly heinous revenge. Pine is good as an immature Kirk, but Quinto really nails it as Spock. Out of the rest of the crew, Karl Urban, John Cho and Simon Pegg make the best impressions as Dr. McCoy, Sulu and Scotty, respectively, while Zoe Saldana as Uhuru, who is quite good, appears to be playing a different character altogether. Anton Yelchin rounds out the cast as a very young and very awkward but still charming Chekov. The pros? The visuals are quite stunning, and Abrams is simply one of the best action directors around, able to stage sequences that are thrilling while also inspiring genuine awe and wonder. The story is also clever enough that it gives filmmakers the license to go their own way with the Star Trek story. The cons? Though the fate of worlds hangs in the balance, and though there’s a lot of excitement generated in general, there’s a curious lack of suspense to the proceedings. Also, while most of the other films and TV episodes revolved around some great philosophical idea or question, audiences will find precious little of that in this version of Star Trek. Judged as a summer blockbuster, Star Trek is pretty terrific. Judged against the series and other Star Trek movies? Well, it’s no Wrath Of Khan, that’s for sure, but I’d rank it just below The Voyage Home: Like that latter film it’s a crowd pleaser, though it possesses an action bent rather than a comic one. So, all in all, I was mightily entertained by the new Star Trek, though I strongly hope the next film includes a return to the intellectual and philosophical underpinnings that endeared audiences to the original Star Trek in the first place.


(For a brief explanation of the Monkey Review rating system, click here.)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: